![]() Does it mean CrystalDiskInfo is interpreting the data and reporting it differently? Is that Bad Block Count really Bad Block Count? I would trust Adata’s tool as they know what they have designed? See the attached screenshot: AA Vendor Specified 72 72 10 Raw Value 101 Hex I downloaded Adata’s SSD Toolbox app and it reports these parameters as Vendor Specified. Maybe they are missing in the hardware itself. I have double checked with Adata SSD Toolbox but the parameters like Reallocated Sector etc are not reported. ![]() There’s no visible data loss as of now.Sometimes when copying a single large file, the speed drops to just 2 – 3 MB/s for a few seconds and then again jumps to 200 MB/s.Are they excluded from I/O after being reported?.What is this bad block count and is it early or later bad blocks?.Now I need to know a few things with respect to this parameter Recent check of SMART values using CrystalDiskInfo reports 257 bad block count. But, before I do anything either RMA or return it, i'm going to try with a USB M.2 NVME enclosure and see if it will be recognized that way.I have Adata su650 480GB SSD which is generally working fine. ![]() I really love the speed of this drive, but if it's not able to work under Linux, then I think i'm just going to return it. The support person basically punted and said to open a RMA to get the drive replaced. If there wasn't any update available, I would not have been able to download the FW that appears in Adata SSD Toolbox. The other reason is that there is no newer update available for the drive." I had already ran the extended Drive Diagnostics (physical scan) in the Adata SSD Toolbox and it didn't report any errors. ![]() The first would be physical errors being reported by the drive, and it was suggested to run 'chkdisk'. The Adata support is horrible and unhelpful, they said "There can only be 2 reasons that wouldn't allow the drive to be updated with newer firmware. Next update: I used Window 10 PE and attempted to update the FW, but again the drive is only detected in Adata SSD Toolbox, and not with the Adata Firmware Flash Updater. Update: I think what I will try next is to boot with a Windows 10 PE or Gandalf's Win 10 ISO and try to update the firmware from there. Workqueue: nvme-wq nvme_remove_dead_ctrl_work Modules linked in: crc32_pclmul crc32c_intel aesni_intel nvme realtek crypto_simd mdio_devres cryptd xhci_pci nvme_core libphy xhci_pci_renesas wmi vmw_vsock_vmci_transport vsock vmxnet3 vmwgfx drm_ttm_helper ttm vmw_pvscsi vmw_vmci virtio_net net_failover failover virtio_pci virtio_pci_legacy_dev virtio_pci_modern_dev virtio_blk workqueue: WQ_MEM_RECLAIM nvme-wq:nvme_remove_dead_ctrl_work is flushing !WQ_MEM_RECLAIM events:flush_cpu_slab nvme nvme0: Removing after probe failure status: -22 Unknown kernel command line parameters "BOOT_IMAGE=/arch/boot/x86_64/vmlinuz-linux archisobasedir=arch archisolabel=ROSL_202207 nvme_load=yes cow_spacesize=16G", will be passed to user space. Kernel command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/arch/boot/x86_64/vmlinuz-linux archisobasedir=arch archisolabel=ROSL_202207 nvme_load=yes cow_spacesize=16G i915.modeset=1 radeon.modeset=1 nouveau.modeset=0 nvidia-drm.modeset=1 module_blacklist=nouveau initrd=/arch/boot/intel-ucode.img,/arch/boot/amd-ucode.img,/arch/boot/x86_64/initramfs-linux.img Command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/arch/boot/x86_64/vmlinuz-linux archisobasedir=arch archisolabel=ROSL_202207 nvme_load=yes cow_spacesize=16G i915.modeset=1 radeon.modeset=1 nouveau.modeset=0 nvidia-drm.modeset=1 module_blacklist=nouveau initrd=/arch/boot/intel-ucode.img,/arch/boot/amd-ucode.img,/arch/boot/x86_64/initramfs-linux.img
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |